by James DeChene

​I’m still amazed at how Amazon decided to pack its virtual bags and abandon plans to build a headquarters in NYC. Not only does it showcase the hoops that businesses go through to relocate and bring jobs and development to a city or region, it’s staggering when you compare cost of living to other areas across the country.

Case in point comes from a WSJ opinion article (PDF version here) from a restauranteur who moved his business from California to Nashville. Comparing cost of living in Arlington (the site of the headquarters building Amazon will build) to NYC to Nashville shows that compared to living in Manhattan, a $150,000 salary there translates into a 51.8% increase in purchasing power in Arlington ($229K) and a whopping 171% increase in purchasing power in Tennessee, to the tune of almost $410,000.

All of this circles back to places like Delaware. We have a ton going for us—low cost of living, urban, suburban, rural and beach lifestyle choices, regionally located to all the places you want to visit but may not want to live, and access to a talented workforce that’s getting better by the day. 

The story also reinforces messages that the State Chamber and other groups have been offering for years related to permits and places like Middletown that get that timing matters. As we’ve heard from site selectors, 6 months for permitting is the sweet spot to get noticed by companies looking to relocate. Efforts continue to track permit status, made easier by DELDOT and DNREC websites created to do just that, but more can and will be done to perfect the process. 

Companies, and their C-suites, should be looking at what happened in NYC with Amazon, and should be making decisions based on how they’ll be received by local communities. The fact remains that Delaware is a bargain, and by continuing to make strides in making us more attractive, we’re in a better position to compete.

by James DeChene

This year’s “Rich States, Poor States” was released this week, and Delaware checks in at 28th for economic performance, and 36th for economic outlook. Performance is calculated by considering state GDP, non-ag employment numbers and domestic migration. No surprise that we come in high (19th) in migration as we are a retirement destination state due to low property taxes and great beaches. For economic outlook, there are 15 areas considered, some in which we score well—no sales tax, low property tax; and some not so well—marginal tax rates on both individual and corporate payers, and average workers compensation costs. These numbers are right around where we were last year: 37th in 2017 and 44th in 2016, but 27th in 2014.
 
In the broader picture, an interesting take away was how net migration will impact congressional seats in the 2020 census.  According to Election Data Services, the following states are poised to gain seats:
·         Texas will gain three, from 36 to 39;
·         Florida will gain two, from 27 to 29;
·         Arizona will gain one, from nine to 10;
·         Colorado will gain one, from seven to eight;
·         Montana will gain one, from at-large to two;
·         North Carolina will gain one, from 13 to 14; and
·         Oregon will gain one, from five to six.

​These states are poised to lose seats:
·         New York will lose two, from 27 to 25;
·         Alabama will lose one, from seven to six;
·         California will lose one or remain even, from 53 to 52 or no change;
·         Michigan will lose one, from 14 to 13;
·         Minnesota will lose one or remain even, from eight to seven or no change;
·         Ohio will lose one, from 16 to 15;
·         Pennsylvania will lose one, from 18 to 17;
·         Rhode Island will lose one, from two to one; and
·         West Virginia will lose one, from three to two.

The “Rich States, Poor States” report lays out these numbers as well, and ties in states' overall tax policy approaches to help explain the migration. If the trend continues, high tax states will continue to lose congressional seats. It will be interesting to see how that changes the makeup on Congress, and their approach to tax policy.

by James DeChene

​Before we get to what happened in Dover this week, a reminder that our networking event at the Delaware National Guard Joint Force Headquarters is a week away. This is your chance to:

1. Network with members of both the State Chamber and the New Castle Country Chamber.
2. Chat with Governor Carney who will be in attendance.
3. Meet the incoming Adjutant General, Brig. Gen. Michael Berry.
4. Witness demonstrations by the DNG's 31st Civil Support Team and Counterdrug Task Force.

 
And now onto Dover. This week the JFC continued to hold meetings hearing budget requests from state agencies. I attended the Departments of Insurance, Labor, and Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) hearings, and each secretary gave a good overview of what their offices are doing and plans for next year. A few items of note included the work the State Chamber, and others like ABC, DCA, Labor and legislators, have done to address issues related to the Workplace Fraud Act and how work is performed on construction sites. That work continues, and I’m thankful that we’re reaching consensus on some big issues that will have a positive impact on the industry and its workers.

Of note from DNREC, Secretary Garvin made the announcement of a website launch in the coming month that will track permit applications made to the department. As you know, the State Chamber has been working with agencies like DELDOT and DNREC on streamlining their permitting processes to help development projects become 'shovel ready' faster. This tracking mechanism, apparently similar to what DELDOT has created, will show not only delays, or speed, from the DNREC side but also track if applications are missing data, causing a slowdown from the business side.  More to come once the website goes live.
 
Hope to see you next week at the Guard event.